Milaim Hasanaj
Redesign of Parkster’s Help & Support flow — focused on clarity, taxonomy, and chatbot integration to improve user access to support.
Play prototype
As part of our Information Architecture course, our team was challenged to improve the Help & Support flow in the Parkster app. The existing support section lacked visibility, was hard to navigate, and often left users unsure of where to find the right help.
Our goal was to redesign the support experience by:
The result: a clearer, faster, and more accessible support flow – helping users resolve issues without frustration.
We started by investigating three areas:
We found that:
To ground our design, we created two personas representing typical Parkster users:
These personas helped us balance directness and discoverability in the support flow.
We surveyed 62 Parkster users, mostly aged 26–45. While many used the app weekly, 17% reported issues—such as zone code confusion, long parking sessions, payment confirmations, and app freezing. Surprisingly, only 4% had used the help function.
Users requested a searchable Q&A section, better access to cheaper parking, and easier payment options like Swish.
We also used card sorting to understand how users organize support content and reviewed the app’s current help taxonomy to identify gaps in structure and accessibility.
We analyzed EasyPark and Aimo Park’s support flows to understand industry standards:
From this, we concluded that Parkster needed:
We restructured Parkster’s support into:
This structure increased findability and reduced the risk of users feeling lost.
User Pain Points:
Proposed Solutions:
Challenges Faced:
We began with brainstorming sessions and rapid paper sketches, allowing us to explore ideas without technical constraints.
This iterative approach gave us confidence before moving into hi-fi prototyping.
In our wireframes, we focused on clarity and accessibility:
The redesigned flow allowed users to:
This structure supported both “known item seekers” like Federico and “exploratory seekers” like Ylva – making support more inclusive and user-friendly.
Key Achievements
What I Learned
Future Directions
Play prototype
Fitfusion
Milaim Hasanaj
Redesign of Parkster’s Help & Support flow — focused on clarity, taxonomy, and chatbot integration to improve user access to support.
Play prototype
As part of our Information Architecture course, our team was challenged to improve the Help & Support flow in the Parkster app. The existing support section lacked visibility, was hard to navigate, and often left users unsure of where to find the right help.
Our goal was to redesign the support experience by:
The result: a clearer, faster, and more accessible support flow – helping users resolve issues without frustration.
We started by investigating three areas:
We found that:
To ground our design, we created two personas representing typical Parkster users:
These personas helped us balance directness and discoverability in the support flow.
We surveyed 62 Parkster users, mostly aged 26–45. While many used the app weekly, 17% reported issues—such as zone code confusion, long parking sessions, payment confirmations, and app freezing. Surprisingly, only 4% had used the help function.
Users requested a searchable Q&A section, better access to cheaper parking, and easier payment options like Swish.
We also used card sorting to understand how users organize support content and reviewed the app’s current help taxonomy to identify gaps in structure and accessibility.
We analyzed EasyPark and Aimo Park’s support flows to understand industry standards:
From this, we concluded that Parkster needed:
We restructured Parkster’s support into:
This structure increased findability and reduced the risk of users feeling lost.
User Pain Points:
Proposed Solutions:
Challenges Faced:
We began with brainstorming sessions and rapid paper sketches, allowing us to explore ideas without technical constraints.
This iterative approach gave us confidence before moving into hi-fi prototyping.
In our wireframes, we focused on clarity and accessibility:
The redesigned flow allowed users to:
This structure supported both “known item seekers” like Federico and “exploratory seekers” like Ylva – making support more inclusive and user-friendly.
Key Achievements
What I Learned
Future Directions
Play prototype
Fitfusion
Redesign of Parkster’s Help & Support flow — focused on clarity, taxonomy, and chatbot integration to improve user access to support.
Play prototype
As part of our Information Architecture course, our team was challenged to improve the Help & Support flow in the Parkster app. The existing support section lacked visibility, was hard to navigate, and often left users unsure of where to find the right help.
Our goal was to redesign the support experience by:
The result: a clearer, faster, and more accessible support flow – helping users resolve issues without frustration.
We started by investigating three areas:
We found that:
To ground our design, we created two personas representing typical Parkster users:
These personas helped us balance directness and discoverability in the support flow.
We surveyed 62 Parkster users, mostly aged 26–45. While many used the app weekly, 17% reported issues—such as zone code confusion, long parking sessions, payment confirmations, and app freezing. Surprisingly, only 4% had used the help function.
Users requested a searchable Q&A section, better access to cheaper parking, and easier payment options like Swish.
We also used card sorting to understand how users organize support content and reviewed the app’s current help taxonomy to identify gaps in structure and accessibility.
We analyzed EasyPark and Aimo Park’s support flows to understand industry standards:
From this, we concluded that Parkster needed:
We restructured Parkster’s support into:
This structure increased findability and reduced the risk of users feeling lost.
User Pain Points:
Proposed Solutions:
Challenges Faced:
We began with brainstorming sessions and rapid paper sketches, allowing us to explore ideas without technical constraints.
This iterative approach gave us confidence before moving into hi-fi prototyping.
In our wireframes, we focused on clarity and accessibility:
The redesigned flow allowed users to:
This structure supported both “known item seekers” like Federico and “exploratory seekers” like Ylva – making support more inclusive and user-friendly.
Key Achievements
What I Learned
Future Directions
Play prototype
Fitfusion